Whereas some demand that grants be scrapped, others reacting to the SASSA Youngsters’s Grants amendments say the federal government is treating the symptom, not the trigger.
Mapontsho Pearl pushed again towards the concept that folks have kids purely for grant cash, stating that R580 a month can’t even assist a toddler by itself. She argued the true points are a scarcity of jobs paying a habitable month-to-month wage and the R370 SRD grant, which she believes ought to be scrapped in favour of employment. She additionally known as for little one assist legal guidelines to be amended so fathers face actual penalties, somewhat than moms having to chase absent mother and father for cash.
‘You must solely have what you’ll be able to afford’
Heather Ann Beykirch took a special angle, arguing that pensioners have earned their assist via a lifetime of labor, and warning that unchecked inhabitants progress is unsustainable. Her view: folks ought to solely have as many kids as they’ll genuinely afford to lift and educate.
Regardless of totally different beginning factors, each commenters land on an identical theme: accountability, whether or not from absent fathers or from mother and father themselves, ought to carry extra weight within the debate than the scale of the grant itself.
Win R2 000 within the South African SASSA grant survey
In case you obtain a SASSA grant and wish to share your story, we wish to hear from you.
Participate in our survey and stand an opportunity to win R2 000. Your responses assist us inform the tales that matter.
