Ban urged on use of West African fish oil by Norwegian salmon companies

The signatories to an open letter embrace representatives from West Africa’s small-scale fishing sector in addition to Norwegian and worldwide organizations equivalent to Associates of the Earth Norway (Naturvernforbundet), the Environmental Safety Affiliation of Norway (NMF), and Oceana.

Different notable teams supporting this marketing campaign embrace Suggestions, the Environmental Justice Basis, and Seas at Danger.

The coalition argues​ that sourcing fish oil from West Africa exacerbates meals insecurity within the area. They contend {that a} substantial portion of the fish oil utilized in Norwegian salmon farming is imported from this space, which is already grappling with extreme meals shortages.

In accordance with their claims, the fish used to provide this oil might have offered as much as 4 million individuals in West Africa with a 12 months’s provide of fish adequate to satisfy their dietary wants.

All these organizations are collectively calling on Norway’s management to curb the growth of the nation’s salmon farming business and to make sure full transparency all through company provide chains. They’re advocating for a direct ban on sourcing fish oil from areas affected by meals insecurity, insisting that Norwegian corporations’ practices align with the nation’s improvement insurance policies.

Business response

The letter and Suggestions’s report, Blue Empire​, declare a big position for the 4 world aquafeed majors—Mowi, Skretting, Cargill, and BioMar—in supplying almost all of the feed utilized in Norwegian salmon farming. The campaigners preserve that these gamers supply fish oil from Northwest Africa. Nonetheless, responses from the feed giants present a nuanced image.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *