You are studying an excerpt from Al-Monitor China-Center East, the place we analyze China’s deepening engagement with the area. To get this text in your inbox weekly, enroll right here.
WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump’s announcement on Tuesday that the US was pausing its navy operation escorting ships by the Strait of Hormuz after simply at some point, got here as Iranian Overseas Minister Abbas Araghchi landed in China for his first go to there because the battle started 68 days in the past.
Beijing sees the writing on the wall and is coming into the dialog at precisely the second when Trump is in search of a method out of the battle whereas persevering with to align itself with Iran.
The assembly between Araghchi and Chinese language Overseas Minister Wang Yi in Beijing on Wednesday, as Rosaleen Carroll reviews, was yet one more indication of Beijing’s political assist for Iran because the battle began, but additionally a chance for China to assist Trump discover an exit to the battle. The assembly, precisely every week earlier than Trump’s long-awaited go to to Beijing, offers China the higher hand to manage the agenda and train leverage within the Hormuz stalemate and the nuclear file.
➡️ How China is displaying assist for Iran
- From the outset of the battle, China has proven assist by persevering with to buy Iranian oil and holding commerce channels open. Over the weekend, China’s Ministry of Commerce ordered home firms to not adjust to US sanctions concentrating on 5 Chinese language oil refiners linked to Iranian crude imports.
- China has offered political cowl for Iran in worldwide boards and in public statements. That assist culminated in China vetoing a UN Safety Council decision on the Strait of Hormuz on April 7, 2026. The Emirati-Bahraini draft aimed to reopen the waterway and defend business delivery, however each China and Russia blocked it.
- A number of reviews say China has provided or facilitated dual-use materials that would assist Iran’s missile and drone capabilities. These reviews embody claims about drone deliveries, missile-related elements and even satellite-linked assist that would enhance concentrating on.
➡️ What’s China’s endgame?
- Early within the battle, China concluded that the US and Israeli objectives of forcing regime change or securing denuclearization in Iran have been unrealistic. That evaluation solely hardened because the battle dragged on and the Iranian system consolidated management. From Beijing’s perspective, the battle then grew to become a chance to weaken the US place, broaden its personal leverage and current itself as a possible dealer if it is capable of get one thing in return.
- China understands how badly Trump desires an exit from the battle. However timing is essential: If no settlement is reached earlier than Trump arrives in China on Thursday, Beijing could be higher positioned to set the agenda, whereas Washington could be weaker in urgent for different concessions on commerce, safety and know-how.
➡️ Can China emerge as a dealer?
- Beijing is making an attempt to play that position however in a method that will give it an edge within the Gulf and with Iran. The Saudi-Iran rapprochement that China brokered in 2023 already gives a blueprint. That deal was extensively seen as proof that Beijing can discuss to rival regional powers, however this one would introduce it as a worldwide safety participant through the Center East.
- It could additionally serve China’s long-term pursuits in postwar Iran, the place Beijing desires to guard entry to vitality, commerce and strategic affect. The trajectory of the battle means that Iran will emerge extra depending on China after the battle, particularly with the hits to its infrastructure, its ballistic missile program and its forex and economic system. The ascendance of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps in Iran factors to a extra authoritarian and militarized type of authorities that’s prone to lean heavier on Beijing.
Joyce’s take: China could also be one of many few powers with sufficient leverage over Iran, sufficient credibility with Gulf states and sufficient diplomatic worth for Trump to assist open an off-ramp from battle. The problem is that Beijing might have affect, however not essentially management. Tehran might take heed to however not comply with Chinese language recommendation if Iranian leaders imagine continued management of Hormuz serves their pursuits or, on the alternative facet, if Trump or Israel resolve to proceed the battle.
